Troops' families feel weight of war
Updated 8/4/2009
USA TODAY
MOUNTAIN VIEW, Calif. — If military families are quietly "coming apart at the seams," as the wife of the Army's top soldier told Congress in June, the evidence is here in the dining room of Army Capt. Mark Flitton and his wife, Lynn.
Their oldest child, Scott, 15, stormed into this room early this year after an argument with his father, asking why his mother ever married "that man." It was here in March where the couple first discussed divorce.
In July, Mark and Lynn explained at the dining room table how they live together now only on a superficial level, driven apart by back-to-back combat deployments and marking days until he goes back to war in Iraq next year.
"I haven't come home yet," admits Mark, 46, who during the past 10 years has spent a cumulative 36 months away in three separate tours. "I'm still in the war mode, and I don't know that I'm going to come out of it until I know I don't have any more war rotations to go back on."
"We've just become so comfortable in living separate lives," says Lynn, 49.
FIND MORE STORIES IN: Afghanistan | Iraq | Iraq War | Father | University of Denver
As the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan continue to demand long and multiple deployments of soldiers, the Army high command is focusing more attention on a tragic consequence to military families. Soldiers and their spouses are learning to live separate lives — the soldier at war, the spouse at home with the children — and it is becoming more difficult with each deployment to get back together.
WAR IN FOCUS: Marines fighting Taliban strive to win Afghan locals' trust
MORE: Bomber in Iraq kills 3 in latest attack
The Army's second in command, Vice Chief of Staff Gen. Peter Chiarelli, says he learned of this during a tour this year of six Army installations hit hard by deployments.
"Spouses were telling me that their husbands were not reintegrating with the family," Chiarelli testified before a House subcommittee Wednesday. "They just realized that that was too hard to do in the short period of time they had (before returning to war) and they would back off from the family, which creates the relationship problems."
The Army is scrambling to address the issue, providing more counselors to help couples address their marital issues, expanding a program run by chaplains that offers marital therapy retreats. In an interview Monday, Chiarelli said he was encouraged by a pilot program creating online counseling services for soldiers and their families.
A crucial goal is to lengthen the time soldiers spend at home between deployments, he says.
Still, many fear that the damage done to marriages is lasting.
"What families are dealing with are the cumulative effects of nearly eight years of war ... effects (that) are not easily reversed," Sheila Casey, wife of Army Chief of Staff Gen. George Casey, told a Senate subcommittee in June.
Army documents and interviews with military families identify why communication between a soldier and his wife break down and problems ensue.
Husbands acquire stoic "survivor" instincts at war — the ability to control their emotions, for example — and bring these skills home. Wives who become experts in living independently struggle to relinquish power.
A soldier's depression or combat stress can make matters much worse, according to research published in February in the Journal of Clinical Psychology.
Statistics are showing a trend in broken military marriages.
The Pentagon says divorce rates among enlisted soldiers and Marines increased to about 4% in 2008, a full percentage point jump from when the Iraq war began. The civilian rate is 3.5%, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
Researchers tracking 226 Army marriages at Fort Campbell, Ky., last year, found that 6% ended in divorce and that nearly 12% of the couples either became divorced or separated, according to results provided to USA TODAY.
Troops in combat who worry their marriages might be failing rose from one in four in 2005 to one in three in 2007, according to an Army study published last year that examined mental health issues plaguing combat troops. More than 250,000 active-duty soldiers are married.
War and separation is historically hard on families. Researchers, though, say a key feature of the current conflicts — the same troops being sent back to combat over and over again, rather than serving one tour and coming home to stay — may be further aggravating marriages.
Each time they are separated, couples say, holding the family together gets tougher.
Carol Herrick, 39, works with family support groups at Fort Sill, Okla., and says she struggles to reassemble her family each time her husband, Donald, a sergeant first class, comes home. He has left for Iraq or Korea four times in eight years.
"The more we do it," she says, "the harder it gets."
Continued at http://www.usatoday.com/news/military/2009-08-03-broken-families_N.htm
-----
Alexandra Gonzalez-Waddington is an Augusta GA divorce lawyer & Georgia Military Divorce Lawyer Augusta Georgia domestic mediator. She is an Augusta military divorce lawyer - Georgia military divorce attorneyGA child custody attorney , and Augusta Georgia child support attorney. She offers mediation for divorce, child custody, and child support.
Uncontested Divorce - Military Attorney
CLOUGH v. RICHELO
Ellington, Judge.
This appeal arises from a legal malpractice suit filed by Walter Clough against attorney Thomas E. Richelo and his law firm, Richelo, Morrissey & Wright, P.C. (collectively, "Richelo"). Richelo filed a motion with the DeKalb County Superior Court to disqualify Clough's attorney, A. Todd Merolla, and Merolla's law firm, Raiford & Dixon, LLP, from representing Clough in the malpractice litigation. The trial court granted Richelo's motion, and Clough appeals,[1] contend
130
ing the court abused its discretion in disqualifying Merolla and the law firm. We find the trial court abused its discretion in disqualifying Merolla and, therefore, reverse. The challenge to the disqualification of the law firm, however, is moot.
By way of background, the record in this case shows that, in 1994, Clough worked as a sales consultant for Main Line Corporation and Noe Santamarina (collectively, "Main Line"). Three years later, Clough directed Main Line to begin making commission payments to Clough Marketing Services, Inc. ("CMS"), which he had recently incorporated in Georgia. Clough's wife owned 100 percent of the shares of CMS. In 1999, Clough sued Main Line in the Fulton County Superior Court, seeking to recover over $1,200,000 in sales commissions (hereinafter, the "Main Line suit"). Clough hired Richelo to represent him in the Main Line suit, and Richelo filed the suit, naming both Clough and CMS as plaintiffs.
In March 2002, while the Main Line suit was still pending, Clough's wife moved to another state and asked Clough for a divorce. Richelo attempted to mediate the couple's disagreement regarding how to proceed with the Main Line suit so that he could continue to represent both Clough and CMS as joint plaintiffs in the suit. Richelo notified the couple that he could not proceed with the Main Line suit until they resolved their disagreement over how to proceed with the suit. In January 2003, Richelo advised Clough that Clough might not have an individual claim against Main Line and that a jury could find that any award from the Main Line suit would be payable only to CMS and its sole shareholder, Clough's wife. Richelo then notified Clough that, unless Clough signed a new agreement that would allow him to continue to represent both Clough and CMS as joint plaintiffs, he (Richelo) was going to withdraw from his representation of Clough, but was going to continue to represent CMS in the Main Line suit. Clough refused to sign the agreement.
Clough retained another attorney, Merolla, who called Richelo in June 2003 and demanded that he withdraw from his representation of CMS in the Main Line suit and return the case files to Clough so Merolla could prepare for trial. According to Clough, Richelo refused to withdraw as CMS's counsel and refused to return Clough's files unless Clough paid him approximately $15,000 in outstanding legal expenses. Clough filed a motion to compel the return of the files with the Fulton County Superior Court. Richelo withdrew from the Main Line case in July 2003, but did not return Clough's case files. The Fulton County court granted Clough's motion to compel in December 2003.
Clough then filed the instant action against Richelo in DeKalb County, claiming that Richelo had committed legal malpractice, breach of fiduciary duty, fraud, negligent misrepresentation, and...
-----
Alexandra Gonzalez-Waddington is an Augusta GA divorce lawyer & Georgia Military Divorce Lawyer Augusta Georgia domestic mediator. She is an Augusta military divorce lawyer - Georgia military divorce attorneyGA child custody attorney , and Augusta Georgia child support attorney. She offers mediation for divorce, child custody, and child support.
Ellington, Judge.
This appeal arises from a legal malpractice suit filed by Walter Clough against attorney Thomas E. Richelo and his law firm, Richelo, Morrissey & Wright, P.C. (collectively, "Richelo"). Richelo filed a motion with the DeKalb County Superior Court to disqualify Clough's attorney, A. Todd Merolla, and Merolla's law firm, Raiford & Dixon, LLP, from representing Clough in the malpractice litigation. The trial court granted Richelo's motion, and Clough appeals,[1] contend
130
ing the court abused its discretion in disqualifying Merolla and the law firm. We find the trial court abused its discretion in disqualifying Merolla and, therefore, reverse. The challenge to the disqualification of the law firm, however, is moot.
By way of background, the record in this case shows that, in 1994, Clough worked as a sales consultant for Main Line Corporation and Noe Santamarina (collectively, "Main Line"). Three years later, Clough directed Main Line to begin making commission payments to Clough Marketing Services, Inc. ("CMS"), which he had recently incorporated in Georgia. Clough's wife owned 100 percent of the shares of CMS. In 1999, Clough sued Main Line in the Fulton County Superior Court, seeking to recover over $1,200,000 in sales commissions (hereinafter, the "Main Line suit"). Clough hired Richelo to represent him in the Main Line suit, and Richelo filed the suit, naming both Clough and CMS as plaintiffs.
In March 2002, while the Main Line suit was still pending, Clough's wife moved to another state and asked Clough for a divorce. Richelo attempted to mediate the couple's disagreement regarding how to proceed with the Main Line suit so that he could continue to represent both Clough and CMS as joint plaintiffs in the suit. Richelo notified the couple that he could not proceed with the Main Line suit until they resolved their disagreement over how to proceed with the suit. In January 2003, Richelo advised Clough that Clough might not have an individual claim against Main Line and that a jury could find that any award from the Main Line suit would be payable only to CMS and its sole shareholder, Clough's wife. Richelo then notified Clough that, unless Clough signed a new agreement that would allow him to continue to represent both Clough and CMS as joint plaintiffs, he (Richelo) was going to withdraw from his representation of Clough, but was going to continue to represent CMS in the Main Line suit. Clough refused to sign the agreement.
Clough retained another attorney, Merolla, who called Richelo in June 2003 and demanded that he withdraw from his representation of CMS in the Main Line suit and return the case files to Clough so Merolla could prepare for trial. According to Clough, Richelo refused to withdraw as CMS's counsel and refused to return Clough's files unless Clough paid him approximately $15,000 in outstanding legal expenses. Clough filed a motion to compel the return of the files with the Fulton County Superior Court. Richelo withdrew from the Main Line case in July 2003, but did not return Clough's case files. The Fulton County court granted Clough's motion to compel in December 2003.
Clough then filed the instant action against Richelo in DeKalb County, claiming that Richelo had committed legal malpractice, breach of fiduciary duty, fraud, negligent misrepresentation, and...
-----
Alexandra Gonzalez-Waddington is an Augusta GA divorce lawyer & Georgia Military Divorce Lawyer Augusta Georgia domestic mediator. She is an Augusta military divorce lawyer - Georgia military divorce attorneyGA child custody attorney , and Augusta Georgia child support attorney. She offers mediation for divorce, child custody, and child support.
